Step 1, Open the Windows Store. You can get Musixmatch for free from the Windows store. To open it, type store into the search bar, and then click Microsoft Store in the search results.Step 2, Type musixmatch into the search bar. A list of matching search results will appear.Step 3, Click Musixmatch Lyrics & Music Player. It’s the red icon with overlapping triangles inside.

In the column to the right of the last column, enter the following formula in each cell: =OFFSET($A$1,ROW()-1,MATCH($J$1,$B$1:$H$1,0)) This tells Excel to look in the header row of the array for a value that matches the year to cell J1, so Excel can use the OFFSET function to pull the data from that year and display it in the cells in column I. Now, all you have to do is create a chart that uses column A for its X-axis and Column I for its data. How to show revenue increase in a chart on excel for mac 2016. So, if you enter 2014 in Cell J1, the formulas in Column I display the data that’s in the cells under 2014 (in this case, Column E).

If you look at API calls in Process Explorer (or similar), it's pretty easy to see that a bug is causing the SQLite DB to be repeatedly compacted. (VACUUM'd, see ). Honestly, I think the damage of this quantity of writes to a modern SSD is a bit overblown, but it's certainly a drag on system resources and is concerning if many apps did this for long periods of time. If you're really concerned, you work around this by causing the VACUUM statement to fail. On windows, you'd open libcef.dll in a hex editor and change each occurrence of 'VACUUM;' to 'abcdef;' On mac, you can do this in the terminal: perl -pi -e 's/VACUUM;/abcdef;/g' /Applications/Spotify.app/Contents/MacOS/Spotify Hope this helps. That makes a hell of a lot of sense if they don't trust the auto vacuum option for some reason, like if it was causing skips when the database kicked into the GC process at just the wrong time. So, they put a vacuum call into the main event monitoring loop (or on a timer), but messed up whatever set the threshold for when it was supposed to happen.

I can think of a million ways that they could have messed it up like that, it would be stupidly easy if something is setting the 'clear to clean up' flag, or simply NOT resetting the flag after a cleanup because some code got accidentally removed. There's a decent chance this is a flaw in the syncing code & caching causing overly aggressive overwrites. My guess would be, not that I have EVER done this before, is that there is a check for 'Is the database stuff we have in memory dirty*? If so, write it.' And for ease, they just write everything. Then, later, someone came along and not realizing this behavior, added a field that updates frequently. And now the entire database gets written every time this field updates.

* For non-DB people, 'dirty' means the data in memory has changed since it last read/written, not that you've got a 2 Live Crew album in your playlist. I almost did that back in the day, but then one installation ended up running from a 3.5' floppy and it turned out to be somewhat nonresponsive. For non-IT people, would you believe that it used to take a couple of minutes to fully read or write a 1.44Mb floppy and that was the biggest you had? Betcha there's lawyers drafting a class action right this very moment. Citing SSD wear, because there's no other damages to be claimed here.

That was sufficiently obvious in the context that I didn't go on (as I was about to) about the ease of quantifying the damages based on the numbers of SSDs, average price, average total lifetime write capacity, numbers of Spotify users, etc. And let's not forget the price of labor for prematurely replacing the drives as well.

I could have also mentioned that the average user would reap a coupon for a free month of Spotify Premium, while the lawyers would settle for just a few tens of millions. I was trying to be succinct for once.